Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.

Table 1 Control measures in Nrg1, Erbb3, and Erbb4 mouse lines. Data shown are means ± SEM for body weight, percent time in and percent entries into the open arms of an elevated plus maze, total arm entries on the maze, latency to fall from a rotarod (trial 5), latency to find buried food and percent of group finding the food in a test for olfactory ability

From: Deficient NRG1-ERBB signaling alters social approach: relevance to genetic mouse models of schizophrenia

 

N

Body weight (g)

%Open arm

Total entries

Rotarod latency (s)

Olfactory test

Time

Entries

Entries

Trial 1

Trial 5

latency (s)

% group

Nrg1

Cohort 1

Nrg1 +/+

10

27 ± 1

4 ± 1%

11 ± 2%

16 ± 1

141 ± 25

260 ± 21

396 ± 120

70%

Nrg1 +/−

10

27 ± 1

6 ± 2%

15 ± 3%

19 ± 2

103 ± 30

230 ± 28

205 ± 89

90%

Cohort 2

Nrg1 +/+

16

35 ± 1

4 ± 1%

9 ± 2%

12 ± 1

236 ± 17

300 ± 0

316 ± 90

75%

Nrg1 +/−

15

33 ± 1

4 ± 1%

11 ± 3%

12 ± 2

207 ± 22

295 ± 3

75 ± 12 *

100%

Erbb3 WT

10

33 ± 2

2 ± 1%

11 ± 6%

5 ± 2

77 ± 11

169 ± 17

144 ± 85

90%

Erbb3 cKO

12

25 ± 0*

0.5 ± 0%

4 ± 2%

6 ± 1

132 ± 14*

187 ± 21

158 ± 32

100%

Erbb4 WT

11a

34 ± 4c

22 ± 4%

25 ± 4%

25 ± 3

110 ± 30

240 ± 32

172 ± 77

90%

Erbb4 cKO

14b

43 ± 1*c

30 ± 3%

29 ± 2%

31 ± 2

61 ± 13

234 ± 24

474 ± 104*

57%

  1. WT wild-type, cKO conditional knockout
  2. a3 males and 8 females
  3. b7 males and 7 females. All other subject numbers are for male mice
  4. cBody weights are given for male mice
  5. *p < 0.05, comparison to wild-type group from same mouse line